Saturday, July 03, 2021

In Her Words: ‘Gosh, this must be OK’

How drinking became normalized.
Melanie Lambrick

By Mara Altman

,

"It's a catch all for everything."

— Emily Lynn Paulson, the founder of Sober Mom Squad, on the normalization of alcohol

ADVERTISEMENT

In the four years since she stopped drinking alcohol, Emily Lynn Paulson has reflected a lot on how central alcohol was to her life.

Quite often, she said, she would drink while taking care of her five children or she'd wake up groggy or unable to recall conversations. But then she'd scroll through Instagram and see a friendly face holding up a mug emblazoned, "Rosé All Day."

It was so normalized: There never seemed to be an occasion when drinking wasn't billed as the appropriate response. "If you're stressed, have a drink; if you're nervous, have a drink; if you want fun, have a drink; if you're grieving, have a drink," Ms. Paulson said. "It's a catch all for everything."

"It made me think, Gosh, this must be OK — everyone around me is doing the same thing."

Ms. Paulson, who last year founded Sober Mom Squad, an online support network for mothers who have stopped or want to curb their drinking, pins this normalization on the alcohol industry which, for years, has targeted women with its advertising, and made people far less likely to question their intake. Less than half of the population is even aware that alcohol is a carcinogen. It can also lead to cancer risk and other health effects including such as liver disease and heart disease — are very real,— especially for women.

ADVERTISEMENT

The inspiration for alcohol's marketing approach with women came from the tobacco industry, which wooed women by tapping into their desire for equality. In 1929, a time when it was taboo for women to smoke in public, marketers hired women to smoke their "torches of freedom" while protesting inequality in an Easter Sunday parade. By the 1960s, Virginia Slims started its influential campaign, "You've come a long way, baby."

In ads, women were pictured, impeccably dressed and oozing self confidence, cigarette in hand. These liberated women were contrasted by images of their sepia-toned forebears who had to sneak cigarettes and risked being punished by their husbands for taking a drag.

Smoking became symbolic. It wasn't just an accessory or a habit, "it was sold as empowerment," said David Jernigan, a professor at Boston University School of Public Health and the former director for the Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Alcohol ads have gone the same way by aligning the product with female liberation and sophistication. "We have a repeat of Virginia Slims," Dr. Jernigan said.

Alcohol companies began expanding their range of products, Dr. Jernigan explained. The push began with wine coolers in the 1980s and continued in the 1990s when alcopops — sweet and fruity alcoholic beverages — came onto the market. The term, which was born from combining the words alcohol and soda pop, applies to drinks like Zima, Smirnoff Ice and Mike's Hard Lemonade.

Though the companies never announced it outright, Dr. Jernigan said the products were positioned for entry level drinkers and people who didn't like the taste of alcohol. "Read: young women," he said. "We called them beer with training wheels." A 2012 paper in the American Journal of Public Health notes the preference of alcopops over beer among high-school girls.

The industry held on to those female consumers, Dr. Jernigan said, by evolving with them as they became mothers. "And now we have MommyJuice," he explained, referring to a wine brand, but which is also a popular term for the alcohol that moms keep in their insulated cups. "We have Mommy's Little Helper." (The latter term was first used to refer to the tranquilizers prescribed to women in the mid-20th century to deal with the challenges of motherhood.)

To alcohol companies, Dr. Jernigan said, women are a market.

The trend toward female-focused advertising is not surprising given the rise in women's socioeconomic status, says Linda Tuncay Zayer, a professor of marketing at the Quinlan School of Business at Loyola University Chicago. Advertisements linking alcohol with sophistication, elegance and sociability have become commonplace. "It's positioned as a way to pamper, escape and relax," Dr. Zayer said.

Recently, Dr. Zayer noticed Anheuser-Busch using themes of female empowerment by tapping Halsey for its "Be A King" campaign. There's also Kate Hudson's new vodka brand, King St., that Dr. Zayer said uses a mix of the feminine aesthetic, star power and female entrepreneurship to sell its brand.

During the pandemic, she said, alcohol was thrust into the limelight as the silver bullet for emotional management. As stress increased, so did the wine memes. "It's supposed to be funny, but it can really make light of excessive drinking," Dr. Zayer said. "The wine-guzzling mom has become an acceptable form of self-care."

The rush to court this market has spurred a number of products and trends, says Carol Emslie, the leader of the Substance Use research group within the School of Health and Life Sciences at Glasgow Caledonian University in Scotland. She sees "pink, fluffy and sparkly" packaging, ads promoting wellness — most notably "low-calorie items" — and products positioned for any and all occasions. "Mother's Day, Valentine's Day," Ms. Emslie said, "it's piggybacking onto everything, even International Women's Day."

The push for female consumers can even be seen in countries where women haven't traditionally been part of a drinking culture. For the past few years, Bailey's has held a Mother's Day campaign in Nigeria, urging women to share the drink with their mothers. "Here, the love of your mother gets tied up with drinking together," Ms. Emslie said, "and this, in a place where women haven't historically drunk."

Part of the issue is that for many women, the reason for drinking alcohol goes deeper than having a buzz, Ms. Emslie explained. They define themselves by what they drink and how they drink it. Through extensive research, Ms. Emslie found that women in their 30s and 40s often use alcohol as a "time out," a demarcation point between work and home life as well as a way to transport themselves to a time before career pressures and household responsibilities. "They drink to bring back that sense of carefree youth, frivolity, fun and spontaneity," she said, "to show their identity beyond what is associated with being a woman in midlife."

"The alcohol industry is really super aware of this," she said, noting that it is hyper-focused on messages that speak to those desires.

Lisa Hawkins, the senior vice president of public affairs for the Distilled Spirits Council, said in an email that it was reasonable and appropriate for spirits companies to develop and market products that appealed to their consumers' tastes, preferences and lifestyle choices. "To suggest that women should be shielded from advertisements about legal products available in the marketplace because they are incapable of seeing an ad and behaving responsibly is patronizing and antiquated," she wrote.

She added, "We encourage all adults who consume alcohol — men and women — to drink in moderation and follow the advice of the federal dietary guidelines."

Dr. Zayer, however, said research had shown over and over that we underestimated the influence of advertising in our lives. "Not just women — it's everyone," she said. "Companies wouldn't be spending all this money on it if it didn't work."

These days, it's not only big companies that bombard women with advertisements. Holly Whitaker, the author of "Quit Like a Woman," argues in her book that women themselves are the marketers now.

"We are marketing to one another," she said in an interview. "When we post a picture of ourselves enjoying a Friday night in a bathtub with a glass of champagne, we are selling the idea that we have to use alcohol to enjoy ourselves."

Ms. Whitaker points to cultural touchstones like Ina Garten mixing cocktails with the nonchalance of baking muffins and "Bad Moms," the movie that works under the premise that moms, after all they do for everyone, deserve to get hammered. It's not even about asking women to quit, she said, and more about "stepping back and asking why we have all decided to view a glass of ethanol as a reward?"

It is important to consider, given that the health effects on women are harsher than for men. Women metabolize and absorb alcohol differently, which leads to the onset of alcohol-related problems including, but not limited to, liver damage, heart disease and brain damage sooner and from smaller amounts of booze.

Although women still drink less than men, the gap has been narrowing. From 1999 to 2017, alcohol-related deaths among women jumped by 85 percent while alcohol use disorder — the inability to control drinking despite adverse consequences — rose by nearly 84 percent between 2002 and 2013. Liver disease is also rising among young women.

Despite the serious health tolls, experts say it is difficult to communicate the dangers of drinking to women, who have had a long, fraught history of fighting for bodily autonomy. A C.D.C. campaign introduced in 2016 to discourage drinking among women of childbearing age had swift and extreme backlash. "It was absolutely hostile: 'How dare you tell us what to do with our bodies!'" Dr. Jernigan recalled, referring to many women's response to the recommendation at the time.

What is even more troubling, says Thomas Babor, a professor of community medicine and public health at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, is that just like Big Tobacco, the alcohol industry has been far from transparent with its consumers, often going to lengths to obfuscate the truth about its health effects. Researchers writing in The Lancet posited there is no amount of alcohol that is safe to consume while other researchers have found that alcohol is responsible for at least 15 percent of breast cancer cases. And yet, Dr. Babor said, alcohol companies are known for practices like "pinkwashing" where they decorate their products in pink to convince consumers that they can help fight breast cancer by buying their goods.

"They are trying to appear as if they support breast cancer research," he said, "when in fact, they are encouraging women to drink at levels that actually contribute to breast cancer."

The industry also continues to promote the idea that moderate drinking is good for our health, which, Dr. Babor says, it justifies by using old studies that are deeply flawed. "You don't have to be an alcoholic," he said — "risk for some 200 health conditions increases with each dose of alcohol you take."

To turn the tide, Ms. Emslie, the alcohol researcher, is raising awareness through a social media campaign called #DontPinkMyDrink. She and her colleagues ask that women use the hashtag when they spot alcohol being cynically marketed via pink packaging and/or low-calorie and wellness promises. "This will challenge how alcohol is sold," she said.

"Women will start to become aware of the messages for themselves."

Subscribe Today

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times with this special offer.

What else is happening

Here are three articles from The Times you may have missed.

Betsey Johnson outside her home with her golf cart, her preferred mode of transport.Scott J. Ross
  • "And I decided that it was going to be a dollhouse." Betsey Johnson gives a tour of her pretty but punk home in one of California's most scenic trailer parks. [Read the story]
  • "We're in service of the bigger truth, the way we as Black women go through the world." Taylour Paige on "Zola," and how it helped her tap into her true identity. [Read the story]
  • "They look at me like I'm an alien." Even as more people identify as bisexual, persistent stigmas remain, with many not feeling fully accepted by their communities. [Read the story]

In Her Words is edited by Francesca Donner. Our art director is Catherine Gilmore-Barnes, and our photo editor is Judith Levitt.

Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here to get future installments. Write to us at inherwords@nytimes.com. Follow us on Instagram at @nytgender.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for In Her Words from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

instagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Thursday, July 01, 2021

On Politics: Legal threats hover over Trump as he weighs a 2024 bid

As the former president weighs a 2024 bid, he faces various lawsuits and investigations.
A supporter at Donald Trump's rally in Ohio last week.Maddie McGarvey for The New York Times

Author's note: It's been a year and a half since I came on board to help Lisa with the On Politics newsletter. It's been a thrill to chronicle this often-dizzying chapter in American history, and I've enjoyed receiving thoughtful feedback along the way from many of you via email.

But this evening's newsletter will be my last. I'm heading off to write a book (though I will continue contributing regularly to The Times's music desk). Feel free to keep up with me on Twitter, or just drop me a line over email.

You're in excellent hands going forward: Starting next week, the excellent Maggie Astor and Marc Tracy will take over the weekday newsletters. And Lisa will still be writing to you on Saturdays. Thanks, and goodbye for now!

— Gio

Donald Trump hit the campaign trail again last weekend, and he certainly seemed happy to be back in the spotlight. He bashed President Biden and undocumented immigrants, repeated his false claims of a stolen 2020 election, and hinted at a possible run for the presidency again in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as he contemplates a return to politics, he has a more immediate question to contend with: Will he be able to stay out of legal trouble?

Today, the Manhattan district attorney's office charged the former president's real estate company, the Trump Organization, with running a 15-year scheme to help executives avoid taxation. A top Trump lawyer, Allen Weisselberg, was accused of dodging taxes on $1.7 million in income; he surrendered to the D.A.'s office this morning.

Weisselberg's was the first indictment to come out of a lengthy investigation that is being conducted by that office, and it could signal a turning point. If he agrees to testify against the former president, Weisselberg would be a powerful witness: He has long been one of Trump's closest financial advisers, and Trump once praised him for his willingness to do "whatever was necessary to protect the bottom line."

After the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, Trump was impeached for a second time — something that hadn't happened to any previous U.S. president. If he were to be indicted on a criminal charge, that too would be a first for a former president.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ed Rollins, the chairman of the Great America PAC, which backed Trump's 2016 and 2020 campaigns but has not pledged to support him in 2024, said that Trump remained the presumptive front-runner for the Republican nomination. Still, he said in an interview, the threat of criminal prosecution "certainly makes it more difficult" for Trump to claim the party's mantle.

"You have to be adding people, adding players, convincing people that, 'My loss was detrimental to the country,'" Rollins added. "People are going to be saying: 'Tell me why I should go back to you. Why should I put money into your campaign?'"

And the Manhattan D.A.'s investigation is only one of a smattering of legal obstacles that Trump may need to overcome, as he considers a possible return. Here's a look at the many investigations and lawsuits that he's currently fighting — touching on his business dealings, accusations of misconduct toward women, and his role in drumming up the Capitol riot.

Taxes and financial affairs

Weisselberg was indicted as part of a long-running investigation by Cyrus Vance, the district attorney for Manhattan. At Weisselberg's arraignment this afternoon, prosecutors described a 15-year tax fraud scheme and leveled 15 felony counts against him, the Trump Organization and Trump Payroll Corporation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vance has assembled a grand jury and is in the process of determining whether to bring charges against Trump; the body has already questioned a number of the former president's associates. Prosecutors have seized Weisselberg's personal tax and financial records, as well as those of his daughter-in-law.

Letitia James, the New York attorney general, also opened a parallel investigation into whether the Trump Organization had manipulated property values to avoid taxes and gain other financial benefits. In May, James's office announced that its investigation, which began as a civil concern, had expanded into the criminal realm and would join Vance's inquiry.

The former president's niece, the psychiatrist and author Mary Trump, has also sued him for fraud. Last year, she filed a suit claiming that Donald Trump had defrauded her out of tens of millions of dollars. She had claimed that when her father, Fred Trump Jr., died, she was prevented from accessing her stake in his will, and that her share was slowly depleted by Donald Trump and other family members. After Fred Trump Sr. died, the remaining Trump siblings sought to exclude Mary from the family holdings entirely, she said.

She accepted a settlement in 2001, but after a 2018 Times investigation drew back the curtain on the family's finances, she filed a lawsuit accusing her uncle and his siblings of fraud and breaching fiduciary trust. The suit is still pending.

Defamation claims

The most high-profile lawsuit against Trump may be the one brought by E. Jean Carroll, a journalist and advice columnist, whose 2019 book accuses him of raping her in the 1990s. After Trump publicly denied the allegation and said Carroll was "not my type," she sued him for damaging her reputation and career.

When Trump was still in office, the Justice Department sought to stanch the lawsuit by arguing that he was legally protected from defamation suits filed over things he said while executing his duties as president. A federal judge ruled against the administration, but the agency's lawyers appealed.

Under Attorney General Merrick Garland, Biden's Justice Department has continued the appeal, saying that Trump's remarks should be protected under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Another woman, Summer Zervos, sued Trump in 2017, days before he took office, saying that he had damaged her reputation and her financial well-being when he denied her accusation of sexual assault. The dispute stems from her time as a contestant on "The Apprentice," when she claims he groped and kissed her against her will.

Because he made the statement in question before becoming president, Trump's remarks aren't protected under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The suit is currently before the New York Court of Appeals.

His actions on Jan. 6

Members of Congress and Capitol Police officers have filed separate suits seeking to hold Trump accountable for his role in organizing and riling up the rioters who stormed the government building on Jan. 6.

Representatives Bennie Thompson of Mississippi and Eric Swalwell of California, both Democrats, have both filed suits arguing that Trump violated the so-called Ku Klux Klan Act, a Reconstruction-era law that makes it a crime for people to conspire to prevent elected officials from discharging their duties.

In a different suit, a pair of Capitol Police officers who were injured on Jan. 6 are seeking damages from Trump for his part in the events of that day. The officers, James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby, say in the suit that they were hit with bear spray, assaulted with flagpoles and crushed against a door by the attackers as they tried to fight them back.

The attorney general of Washington, D.C., Karl Racine, has also opened an investigation into whether Trump's incendiary language rose to the level of criminal incitement.

The Supreme Court upholds Arizona voting restrictions.

By Adam Liptak

The U.S. Supreme Court today upheld voting restrictions in Arizona and signaled that challenges to new state laws making it harder to vote would face a hostile reception from a majority of the justices.

The vote was 6 to 3, with the court's three liberal members in dissent.

The decision was the court's first consideration of how a crucial part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 applies to voting restrictions that have a disproportionate impact on members of minority groups, and it was issued as disputes over voting rights have taken center stage in American politics.

As Republican-controlled state legislatures increasingly seek to impose restrictive new voting rules, Democrats and civil rights groups have turned to the courts to argue that Republicans are trying to suppress the vote, thwart the will of the majority and deny equal access to voters of color. The Arizona decision suggested that the Supreme Court would not be inclined to overturn many of the state measures.

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, said courts should strike down voting restrictions only when they impose substantial burdens on minority voters that effectively block their ability to vote, and added that states had a legitimate interest in rooting out fraud.

"Fraud can affect the outcome of a close election, and fraudulent votes dilute the right of citizens to cast ballots that carry appropriate weight," he wrote.

In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the majority had done violence to the Voting Rights Act, a civil rights landmark.

NEW YORK TIMES PODCASTS

Sway: Biden's chief of staff on what he's worried about

On today's episode, Kara Swisher spoke with Ron Klain, President Biden's chief of staff. She pressed Klain on whether the president's ambitious agenda and focus on bipartisanship will succeed — or whether infrastructure will be "Biden's Obamacare," costing Democrats their control of Congress in 2022.

Subscribe Today

We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times with this special offer.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.
Is there anything you think we're missing? Anything you want to see more of? We'd love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Politics With Lisa Lerer from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018