Saturday, August 29, 2020

In Her Words: W.N.B.A.’s Message

The league is pushing for racial justice.
The Washington Mystics wore white T-shirts that spelled out Jacob Blake on the front and featured illustrations of seven bullet holes on the back. The team was protesting the police shooting of a Black man in Kenosha, Wis., during the W.N.B.A. postponement announcement on Wednesday at Feld Entertainment Center in Palmetto, Fla. Julio Aguilar/Getty Images

“To have other Black women, saying, ‘No, Sis, we’re not going to forget about you’. … That is the game-changing moment.”

— Kimberlé Crenshaw, co-founder of the #SayHerName campaign

ADVERTISEMENT

In the wake of the shooting of 29-year-old Jacob Blake by police in Kenosha, Wis., the Women’s National Basketball Association postponed scheduled games on Wednesday and then again on Thursday, using the time as a “day of reflection” and to recommit to the social justice causes that underpin their season this year.

“We are doubling down on our previous calls to action,” Nneka Ogwumike, president of the league’s players’ union and forward on the Los Angeles Sparks, said on ESPN on Thursday. Like the rest of the players, Ogwumike wore a black T-shirt that read “Arrest the Cops Who Killed Breonna Taylor” in big, bold letters. She was flanked by other union representatives, including the New York Liberty’s Layshia Clarendon.

“We call upon Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron to arrest the officers that killed Breonna Taylor,” Ogwumike said. “Let us not let up seeking justice for Sandra Bland, Michelle Cusseaux, Shelly Frey, Korryn Gaines, India Kager, Kayla Moore, Layleen Polanco, Michelle Shirley and other Black and brown women who are victims of police violence.”

Nneka Ogwumike with her team at the end of an exhibition basketball game early this year in Hartford, Conn.Jessica Hill/Associated Press

Much of U.S. sports came to a halt on Wednesday night, with walkouts spread across teams from leagues including the National Basketball Association and Major League Baseball, marking a historic day in professional athletics. But for W.N.B.A. players, the move was just another step in a yearslong stand against racial injustice.

ADVERTISEMENT

As far back as 2016, players and teams wore shirts supporting Black lives and protesting gun violence, organized media blackouts and kneeled during the national anthem, often drawing the ire of league officials and a public that has told them to “stick to sports.” This year, amid social unrest and a pandemic that forced them to conduct their season inside a bubble in Bradenton, Fla., the entire W.N.B.A. is honoring Black women and girls by dedicating its season to Breonna Taylor and the #SayHerName campaign.

Created in 2014, the #SayHerName campaign aims to broaden the national conversation about anti-Black police violence to include the names of Black women and girls whose stories tend to be overlooked. Kimberlé Crenshaw, a co-founder of the campaign, reflected on the W.N.B.A.’s work with #SayHerName.

After the W.N.B.A. announcement on Wednesday of postponed games for the evening, the Washington Mystics donned white T-shirts with seven bullets drawn on the back, protesting the police shooting of Jacob Blake.Julio Aguilar/Getty Images

“To have other Black women, saying, ‘No, Sis, we’re not going to forget about you. We are going to bring you into the spotlight’ — that is the game-changing moment for Black women in this century that we’ve been waiting for,” Crenshaw told In Her Words.

This season, W.N.B.A. players are warming up in shirts printed with the words “Say Her Name” on the back and “Black Lives Matter” on the front. Other shirts call for the arrest of the cops who killed Breonna Taylor. There are pregame tributes, featuring photos and moments of silence, honoring the Black women lost to police violence. And postgame notes to the news media include the Say Her Name hashtag and continue to call for justice for Taylor.

For a league that is predominantly Black and that has fought for national recognition and attention for 24 years, amplifying #SayHerName strikes close to home. “We know what it feels like to live on the margins, even within the sports community,” New York Liberty’s Clarendon said.

In Her Words spoke with four W.N.B.A. players — Clarendon, Chicago Sky’s Sydney Colson, and Sue Bird and Breanna Stewart of the Seattle Storm — about the Say Her Name campaign, white allyship and the broader push for racial and gender justice in 2020.

This interview, conducted before this week’s events, has been condensed and edited for clarity.

This year, your jerseys have Breonna Taylor’s name printed on the back. What does it feel like putting them on?

Chicago Sky guard Sydney Colson.Phelan M. Ebenhack/Associated Press

Sydney Colson: For me, it’s not so much an eye-opener because I’m well aware of how Black people have been treated in this country. Putting that jersey on as a Black woman … I feel like it means something more than just playing basketball. People are thinking about Breonna and wanting justice for her.

New York Liberty guard Layshia Clarendon.Phelan M. Ebenhack/Associated Press

Layshia Clarendon: It’s really somber in a lot of ways. In a season where we have so many televised games, we have a platform. But at the same time, the weight of it, like — we have to put Breonna Taylor’s name on the back of our jerseys to keep raising awareness, to get some semblance of whatever justice could look like for her and her family. It really is this constant swirl of pride that we’re getting to do this, but also heartbreak and despair.

Seattle Storm guard Sue Bird.Phelan M. Ebenhack/Associated Press

Sue Bird: It’s a way to acknowledge and amplify all the things that are happening in our country. I find in those moments just before a game, when the league has the Say Her Name montage, is a time to reflect: to know whose name is on the back of your jersey, know why her name is on the back of your jersey, know that women’s names don’t get said enough.

Seattle Storm forward Breanna Stewart, left.Chris O'Meara/Associated Press

Breanna Stewart: It shows the solidarity that we have together and what we’re really fighting for. There are so many women like Breonna Taylor. Being a white athlete in the W.N.B.A, I want to continue to be an ally, to create justice for those that have not gotten it and a better world where this doesn’t happen anymore.

W.N.B.A players in particular have been at the forefront of fighting for justice, but the partnership with Say Her Name brings together racial and gender issues, making this an intersectional moment. When did you first come to experience or understand these issues through an intersectional lens, and what has that journey been like?

Sydney: I’ve always been aware of the different ways I’m discriminated against as a Black woman — kind of hard not to be aware of them. But I didn’t have a name for it until recently, when I learned about Professor Crenshaw, who coined the term intersectionality, and connected with her personally and studied up on her work.

Layshia: I first started learning about intersectionality during my undergrad at University of California, Berkeley. My degree was in sociology, so I studied how intersectional identities affect each other. And as someone who is Black and queer, I know quite literally how close to home and how important it is for us to take an intersectional approach. More recently, I’ve been following prominent activists like Alicia Garza and Raquel Willis who are constantly challenging and pushing the boundaries on intersectionality.

What does it mean to be a white ally in this league?

Sue: Being an ally is not just one thing. In some situations, it could be as simple as helping pass the mic or making sure my Black teammate is being heard. I’m not Black. I’m not feeling racism on a daily basis. If I’m going to try to help my counterparts in this league get something done, and they’re feeling the burden of all of it happening at once, I can take something off their plate. That is also how I have been an ally.

The Seattle Storm paused for a moment for Sandra Bland during a W.N.B.A. game at Feld Entertainment Center in Palmetto, Fla., this month.Octavio Jones for The New York Times

Breanna: It means talking to some of our Black teammates and hearing what they have to say — really hearing them out. It means having uncomfortable conversations with my family or my friends about everything that’s going on in society and the racism that has been going on in our country. It means continuing to listen and be a voice and amplify the message.

Sydney: During the civil rights movement, it was necessary for white people to be involved, to be a voice, to be allies — not to speak for us, but to speak to one another. I think it’s necessary and honestly, it’s unavoidable if we really want to get to a better place in this country.

Layshia, you’ve talked about how going back to play this season gave the league an opportunity to be “centered in a way that an 80 percent Black” and LGBTQ+ league typically isn’t. Now that you’re all there at center court, what’s it like, especially during this moment of upheaval?

Layshia: It feels heavier than I expected. At the same time, there’s the fact that we are getting centered. The world is finally catching up to how great we are and how awesome our league is. I wanted the spotlight for everyone. We’ve all played for so many years and worked so hard for this moment. We didn’t get on the cool train of like, “Yo! Let’s start talking about politics and voting and Black Lives Matter.” We have been doing this work. It’s like basketball: Preparation shows, and we’ve been prepared for this moment.

The Times journalist Kurt Streeter pointed out that female athletes, particularly W.N.B.A. players, fighting injustice often do so without the same recognition their male counterparts receive. Is this season different?

Sydney: I do feel like we’re finally being heard. It took two pandemics happening simultaneously for people to sit down and listen. And while it is about coverage, it’s also about being Black women.

You have a lot of support for your activism but also many critics, some of whom are associated with the W.N.B.A., saying we need less, not more, politics in sports, so as not to alienate fans. Do you pay attention to that criticism?

Sue: To say to us, as W.N.B.A. players, to keep politics out of sports is incredibly hypocritical. There’s some irony because all anyone has ever done is judge us on everything but the game of basketball. We’re judged because we’re women. We’re judged because we’re Black. We’re judged because we’re gay.

People ask, “What makes women’s basketball players so good at this?” We just literally had to fight for ourselves for so long. And now we’re in a moment when all of those things have come to a head. If anything, we would love to be judged as basketball players. Imagine that — where they’re just talking about your play on the court and not what you look like and not who you’re dating. Imagine? That would be amazing.

What else is happening

Here are three articles from The Times you may have missed.

Revelers at a concert in Chongli, in the northern province of Hebei, last week.Ng Han Guan/Associated Press
  • “Relaxed and free.” In China, where the pandemic began, life is starting to look normal. But some worry that people are letting their guard down too soon. [Read the story]
  • “Four years later, here I am.” In 2016, the would-be first daughter was seen by some to have the power to persuade moderate women voters and to rein in her own father’s impulses. A lot is different now. [Read the story]
  • “We live in two different countries right now.” Right-wing influencers are dominating the political discussion on Facebook, raising questions about whether it will translate into electoral success in November. [Read the column]

In Her Words is edited by Francesca Donner. Our art director is Catherine Gilmore-Barnes, and our photo editor is Sandra Stevenson.

Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here to get future installments. You can also follow us on Instagram or email us at inherwords@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for In Her Words from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

instagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Poll Watch: Is Teleprompter Trump Effective?

Although most voters complain about President Trump’s often abrasive personality, Americans

Welcome to Poll Watch, our weekly look at polling data and survey research on the candidates, voters and issues that will shape the 2020 election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Throughout his first run for the Republican presidential nomination, Donald J. Trump derided teleprompters as a silly stamp of political insiderism. “I say we should outlaw teleprompters,” he said at a rally in 2015, “for anybody running for president.”

But as Mr. Trump accepted his party’s nomination at the 2016 Republican National Convention, he read his speech from, yes, a teleprompter. That night he stayed on message, outlining his “America first” ideology and casting himself as a defender of “the forgotten men and women of our country.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And on Thursday, facing a large (and largely unmasked) crowd during the R.N.C., Mr. Trump again read a lengthy speech from a teleprompter.

“We are one national family,” Mr. Trump said, a much different tone than at his freewheeling news conferences. “And we will always protect, love and care for each other.”

His attempt at a softer touch and more disciplined message is clearly designed to counteract the main criticism voters have of Mr. Trump: that his personality and his public statements are abrasive, rude and unfiltered.

Indeed, as reviled as many of his policies are among voters on the left, Americans over all are actually far more likely to say they are bothered by his personal foibles than by his politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ed Goeas, a veteran Republican pollster, said that many traditionally Republican voters and independents have no major problem with the president’s policies, but can’t stomach his public persona. “There are those who like his policies but really are turned off by his persona,” Mr. Goeas said.

Until the coronavirus pandemic, he added, Mr. Trump’s strong suit had been the thriving economy. Most voters are still about evenly split, according to polls, on whether Mr. Trump or Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Democratic nominee, would be a better steward of the economy. But with unemployment in the double digits amid the shutdowns, Mr. Trump has lost his strongest argument — while only increasing his presence in the public eye.

“For the last five months, with the coronavirus and the social unrest, all they’re seeing is the persona side of him, and not as much focus on the one thing that is his main strength — which is performance on the economy,” Mr. Goeas said.

Polling shows that many of the policies Mr. Trump touted in his renomination speech, including ditching the Paris climate accord and signing an enormous tax cut in 2017, have long been relatively unpopular. So are some of the most central aspects of his political agenda: According to a Fox News poll this month, 53 percent of voters disagreed with Mr. Trump’s approach to immigration, while 41 percent agreed. And when it comes to negotiating with China — a particular point of pride for the president — 57 percent of Americans said they disapproved of how he was handling that, while just 40 percent approved, according to a recent Gallup poll.

Yet only one-third of the country said his policies were “too conservative” over all, according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll this month. That includes just 34 percent of independents — a key voting bloc in his 2016 victory that has largely turned against him since then.

By comparison, in October 2004, on the eve of that year’s election, multiple surveys found that a greater share of Americans — four in 10 — saw then-President George W. Bush as too conservative. He won re-election anyway, beating John Kerry by more than than 2 percentage points.

For Mr. Trump, 43 percent of respondents to this month’s ABC/Post poll said he was about right ideologically, and another 11 percent didn’t give an opinion.

Indeed, for many voters, his policies simply aren’t the main point. Even among his own supporters, a Pew Research Center poll this month found that when asked to give their main complaint about their candidate, 25 percent mentioned his temperament or his lack of filter. Another 14 percent said they were bugged by his Twitter persona.

Among political independents who supported Mr. Trump, close to three in 10 said his temperament was their biggest complaint.

When asked to choose their preferred candidate on a range of traits, voters tend to lean toward Mr. Biden. But in a separate ABC/Post poll from July, Mr. Biden’s advantage was never greater than on matters of personality and temperament. Voters sided with Mr. Biden over Mr. Trump by a gaping 26-point margin.

“Some of the language that he uses, whether you want to call it braggadocious — it almost seems to be overstating things so much that it loses credibility,” Mr. Goeas said of the president. “That was not what you saw in that speech last night. So that’s what he got from the teleprompter. But the question becomes, how long before he can’t help himself? How long before the next tweet?”

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.
Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Politics With Lisa Lerer from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018