Saturday, August 08, 2020

Trump’s Axios Interview, Kanye West’s Campaign: This Week in the 2020 Race

President Trump wants to brand Joe Biden as a doddering gaffe machine. But the incumbent’s own rhetoric causes so much controversy it is overwhelming the strategy.

Welcome to our weekly analysis of the state of the 2020 campaign.

President Trump’s charge that Joseph R. Biden Jr. was “against God” drew ire from across the political spectrum.Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

The week in numbers

  • A poll this week showed Trump’s support stabilizing in Iowa. Trump led Biden among registered voters in the Monmouth University poll, 48 percent to 45 percent. Trump appears weaker in the state than he was in 2016, when he won Iowa by more than 9 points, but his support appears to be holding steady there in recent polling.
  • The Biden campaign spent $11.8 million on television ads, and the Trump campaign spent $4.4 million.
  • On Facebook, Trump again outspent Biden, roughly $723,000 to $17,000.

Catch me up

Mr. Biden will not appear in Milwaukee at the Democratic National Convention.Michelle V. Agins/The New York Times

If President Trump and his allies wanted to cast Joe Biden as an error-prone politician of yesteryear, this week they got some help.

Mr. Biden’s interview with a slew of Black and Latino journalists produced two clippable comments for Republicans: At one point, Mr. Biden got testy with a reporter who asked him about taking a mental aptitude test, suggesting the reporter should be tested for cocaine and asking, “Are you a junkie?” At another stage of the interview, Mr. Biden contrasted Black and Latino communities by saying the latter had more diversity.

But both comments, and Mr. Biden’s eventual attempt to walk back his remarks about Black diversity, were overshadowed by Mr. Trump’s own statements, a consequence of the president’s lack of discipline in executing his own campaign strategy. Mr. Trump’s charge that Mr. Biden, a practicing Catholic, was “against God” drew ire from across the political spectrum and supplanted Mr. Biden’s comments in the news cycle.

It was a microcosm of Mr. Trump’s current political struggle: He succeeded in 2016 as advisers “let Trump be Trump.” Now, he can’t seem to stand down, even when it would be helpful to let Biden be Biden.

ADVERTISEMENT

Biden and Trump both loved Trump’s Axios interview

Between his regular appearances in the White House briefing room, his overactive Twitter feed and his endless interviews with anchors on Fox News, President Trump can often feel like a leader who is unavoidable for comment. But Mr. Trump’s interview last week with Jonathan Swan, a reporter for Axios, still managed to show the president in a different light.

“It is what it is,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Swan when pressed about how he could claim the pandemic was under control with the United States averaging more than a thousand deaths per day.

The callous statement from a president who has been unable to demonstrate empathy in public throughout the coronavirus pandemic was quickly promoted by Mr. Biden, who has been running a campaign based in large part on the simple notion that the country needs an empathetic leader at this time.

The strange part: Mr. Trump and his aides liked the interview, too. “I thought it was a good interview,” Mr. Trump said afterward. Many of his aides deemed the hoopla over Mr. Trump’s comments overrated, but did not see the interview as a mistake.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • In fact, with rallies off the calendar for the foreseeable future, Mr. Trump’s aides said they planned to have him do more interviews like the one with Axios. They think interviews with Sunday show hosts, television network anchors and mainstream news outlets are ultimately helpful to Mr. Trump, in addition to his steady diet of softball sitdowns with Fox News hosts like Sean Hannity.
  • Mr. Trump is also directing some of the coverage himself, suggesting to his aides the reporters he wants to meet with and pushing for those interviews himself.
  • Mr. Swan’s interview also underscored the uneven playing field that is the briefing room, where Mr. Trump controls the give-and-take with journalists. Faced with a well-prepared reporter who had the time and space to follow up on his own questions, Mr. Trump appeared defensive and flat-footed in his understanding of his own administration’s virus response.

Republicans are helping Kanye West’s campaign. Why?

Kanye West has missed the deadline to get on the ballot in many states, but could serve as a spoiler in others, including battlegrounds like Wisconsin and Ohio.Lauren Petracca Ipetracca/The Post and Courier, via Associated Press

The realness of Kanye West’s presidential campaign depends on whom you ask. The cultural icon and rap artist has filed forms declaring his candidacy in several states. This week, reports exposed an interesting, if not surprising, twist: Republican operatives in swing states were helping Mr. West’s efforts, gathering signatures in places like Wisconsin and Colorado to give the self-proclaimed Yeezus more legitimacy.

Why are some Republicans helping his campaign? According to a political reporter in Wisconsin, the state G.O.P. was hoping Mr. West could play the role of spoiler in November, siphoning votes from Mr. Biden. That is a big bet, riddled with assumptions and lacking supporting evidence. Here is what we know:

ADVERTISEMENT

  • There is no evidence Mr. West would win a significant number of Black voters. In 2018, when Mr. West was included in a national CNN poll, he was viewed favorably by only 20 percent of nonwhite adults, about the same as his rating among white adults. And he was viewed more favorably by Republicans (35 percent) than by Democrats (12 percent).
  • The lane for spoiler candidates in 2020 is smaller than in 2016. In polling, Mr. Biden’s unfavorable ratings are much lower than those for Hillary Clinton, the previous Democratic nominee. That leaves less room for third-party candidates to capitalize on voters who dislike both candidates.
  • Mr. West’s political views are … inconsistent. He has given money to and supported progressive Democrats, donned a “Make America Great Again” hat, denounced the oppression of Black people and criticized abortion. There is no clear ideological home.

The debate about the debates

Mr. Trump during the final presidential debate in 2016.Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call, via Getty Images

This much is clear: The Trump campaign and the Biden campaign have agreed to three debates, scheduled for late September and October. This week, however, the Trump campaign requested a fourth presidential debate to be held earlier in September. The idea was floated by Mr. Trump’s confidante and personal lawyer, the former New York City mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani.

The gambit was shot down by the nonprofit commission that governs presidential debates, but it’s another sign Republicans are desperate to shake up the race. Mr. Trump’s supporters have crowed for months that in a one-on-one setting, the president would expose Mr. Biden as feckless and out of touch. They have tried to paint Mr. Biden as scared to debate Mr. Trump.

The Democratic presidential primary should be instructive for this approach. Many of Mr. Biden’s primary opponents also assumed he would flail on the debate stage, but in key moments he rose to the occasion. And the predictions that Mr. Biden would be a poor debater lowered the bar enough that he could clear it. Be careful what you wish for.

What you might have missed

  • The Democratic National Convention is going all virtual. Not even Mr. Biden will appear in Milwaukee to accept the party’s nomination. It’s a blow to a city that had prepared to host thousands and more recently has been ravaged by the coronavirus pandemic. In terms of politics, Democrats are hoping voters reward them for taking the virus seriously.
  • Vice President Mike Pence thinks Mr. Biden’s decision to stay home has created an opportunity for the president’s re-election campaign — and has scheduled his own campaign trip to Wisconsin on Aug. 17 with the hope of filling the void.
  • Mr. Trump on Friday night called a surprise “news conference” at his private club in Bedminster, N.J. There, he said the coronavirus was “disappearing, it’s going to disappear,” a return to the kind of dismissive attitude toward the virus his aides have tried to convince him is hurting his re-election chances.

Thanks for reading. On Politics is your guide to the political news cycle, delivering clarity from the chaos.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.

Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Politics with Lisa Lerer from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

Friday, August 07, 2020

On Politics: Why an Accurate Census Is So Important

The Census Bureau’s move to cut its collection period short by one month has unnerved pollsters.

Welcome to Poll Watch, our weekly look at polling data and survey research on the candidates, voters and issues that will shape the 2020 election.

What do you do when the gold standard turns to bronze?

The Census Bureau’s decision to cut its collection period short by one month in the midst of an already challenging pandemic has made pollsters and other statisticians nervous that this year’s census could deliver faulty data. That would leave pollsters without the baseline population portrait they use when crafting surveys and analyzing results.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Every demographic survey I’m aware of, they use the census,” John Thompson, a former director of the Census Bureau, said in an interview. “If there’s undercounts in the 2020 census, and they’re large, that means that these surveys and these polls won’t be as accurate, because they’ll be under-representative.”

Observers have been quick to point out the immediate implications of a census undercount, both statistically and politically. It would most likely affect the representation of non-English speakers and low-income people, who are typically among the hardest for demographers to reach, and who tend to tilt Democratic.

But it also appears likely that an undercount would disproportionately affect rural communities, a group that is part of President Trump’s political base.

What happens when census workers can’t reach someone

When the Census Bureau can’t reach a household, it must often send field collectors to gather data by physically knocking on the door. The coronavirus inherently makes work harder for these collectors — known as enumerators — because many Americans may be wary of answering a house call in the middle of a pandemic, particularly in hard-hit areas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other groups may also have their own reasons for wariness and could therefore be harder to count. Experts have repeatedly expressed concern that Mr. Trump’s attempts last year to include a citizenship question on the census may have frightened some people in immigrant communities away from participating, although the Supreme Court ultimately rejected the move.

“Everybody is not counted, no matter what,” said Peter Miller, a retired public opinion expert at Northwestern University who spent seven years as the senior researcher for survey measurement at the Census Bureau. “You miss some people. Well, you’re going to miss many more now.”

If households can’t be reached, even by enumerators, then census takers rely on a process known as imputation — that is, they use data from demographically similar respondents to take a best guess at what the missing data ought to say.

“This year I can imagine imputation being much higher, and that will itself be a source of controversy — because imputation involves assumptions,” Dr. Miller said. “No matter what you do at that point, you’re going to have a bunch of places around the country that are unhappy with the numbers, and are going to sue. So there’s going to be a lot of controversy around this.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Where more imputation is needed, Dr. Miller said, the door opens a bit wider for statistical wrangling — and, potentially, more political influence.

In June, in an unprecedented move, the president created two high-level positions at the Census Bureau and filled them with political appointees.

How pollsters use census data

The census is used to redraw congressional and local voting districts, and to determine how about $1.5 trillion of federal funds should be allocated. And it’s just as crucial to the work done by public and private pollsters, as well as academic statisticians.

“All public opinion polls are somewhat flawed in their raw form, without any statistical adjustment,” Courtney Kennedy, the director of survey research at the Pew Research Center, said in an interview. “We calibrate all of our surveys to that statistical portrait that we get from the Census Bureau.”

Because the census occurs only every 10 years, the bureau keeps its data current by regularly updating two major demographic resources using rolling estimates: the Current Population Survey, a source of statistics on the labor force, and the American Community Survey, which tallies information on households and the general population.

It is against those data that pollsters usually base their demographic presumptions. If a poll is conducted and the raw results have a considerably lower share of, for instance, Hispanic respondents than indicated in the American Community Survey, the pollsters will add more “weight” to the survey’s Hispanic respondents.

The Census Bureau also prepares what is called a Hard to Count index, assessing which areas and populations within the country were most elusive to reach. This resource also becomes useful to pollsters, particularly when they are surveying especially difficult-to-reach areas of the country, as they take added precautions to ensure the randomness of their sample.

How the administration has (and hasn’t) adjusted to the pandemic

Originally, the Census Bureau’s period for contacting hard-to-reach people was slated to begin in mid-May and run through July 31. But with the coronavirus scrambling things, the bureau moved that period back, from Aug. 11 to Oct. 31, roughly mirroring the original two-and-a-half-month timeline.

But this week the agency announced that it would end field data collection by Sept. 30, meaning a shorter period in the middle of a pandemic.

Mr. Thompson and three other former directors of the Census Bureau signed a letter urging the administration to reverse the move, echoing another plea written days earlier by Robert Coats, the chair of the national steering committee of the State Data Center, which acts as a liaison between the Census Bureau and state and local governments.

“We thought it was going to be a challenge doing it by Oct. 31,” Mr. Coats said in an interview. “Shortening it to Sept. 30 really ups the bar. It’s a really difficult challenge to accomplish in a shorter amount of time.”

In 2010, 74 percent of households contacted by the Census Bureau filled out and mailed back forms. As of Friday morning, the response rate for this year’s count sat at 63 percent.

The plan to move the data collection deadline back to Oct. 31 also included a proposal to shift the delivery of reapportionment data from December 2020 to April 2021. Aside from concerns over data collection and accuracy, the most obvious political consideration is that taking extra time would lead to delays in the delivery of reapportionment data — the numbers that control how House districts are drawn — until next year, after the president’s current term ends.

Mr. Trump announced last month that he would seek to exclude undocumented residents from reapportionment data, something that a Democratic administration could most likely undo before the data is released.

Democrats in the House are pushing for the next round of coronavirus stimulus legislation to include a stipulation moving the reapportionment deadline back to next year. This would presumably free up the Census Bureau to continue collecting field data for a longer period. But the Senate’s Republican leadership has so far expressed no interest in the proposal.

“I’m hoping that the Senate will include a provision in the Covid bill that gives the census the time that it had been counting on to deal with the ramifications of this disease, which tied it up in knots for months,” Dr. Miller said. “They’re in a very, very hard position now, and unless we get more time, this is just going to be a train wreck.”

These kinds of debates are not entirely new — and this year’s fandango has a particular historical resonance with the census of exactly 100 years ago.

In 1920, the country was also reeling from a pandemic. It also had just been through World War I, and many displaced people had flooded into the country from across Europe, prompting questions about how — and whether — to count them.

In the end, the census was conducted with such great difficulty that its data was never fully adopted, and no congressional reapportionment happened until after the 1930 census.

“Do we want to go down the same road?” Mr. Coats said. “We still have a little bit of time to make this work.”

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.
Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Politics with Lisa Lerer from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018