Thursday, February 25, 2021

On Politics: CPAC Starts Tomorrow and Trump Is Still Center of the Republican Universe

The annual conference is homecoming weekend for the ultraconservative base of the Republican Party.
Erik S Lesser/EPA, via Shutterstock

Things have been quiet on the Republican front since President Donald Trump left the White House five weeks ago.

With Democrats pushing to deliver a widely popular economic-relief package and accelerate the circulation of coronavirus vaccines, the G.O.P. has not yet landed on a countermessage for voters in the middle. But for most of the Republican base, Trump is still the center of the political universe — even in absentia.

Don't believe it? Just tune in to coverage of the Conservative Political Action Conference, which gets underway tomorrow morning in Orlando, Fla., and where on Sunday, Trump will give his first major address since leaving office.

Known as CPAC, the annual conference is homecoming weekend for the ultraconservative base of the Republican Party. A strong reception there can give a big boost to politicians looking to burnish their credentials and cast their fortunes forward.

A number of rising figures in the party will get coveted speaking time, including Senators Tom Cotton of Arkansas, and Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who will deliver the conference's kickoff address tomorrow at 9 a.m.

The state's junior senator, Rick Scott, who's widely thought to hold presidential ambitions, will also speak at the conference. (A subtle theme of the weekend is the centrality of Florida politics and politicians; under Trump, the state became a de facto petri dish for the new Republicanism.)

But ultimately, this will almost certainly be Trump's show. And not for nothing: As our reporter and Trump guru Maggie Haberman recently wrote in an article previewing his appearance on Sunday, Trump is privately focused on another run for president in 2024. Without access to Twitter, having spent weeks in virtual public silence — speaking only in a few scattered phone interviews after the death of Rush Limbaugh — Trump is likely to take advantage of this opportunity to air his grievances and reposition himself as the head of his flock.

ADVERTISEMENT

"CPAC has always been an important support group for him, so my sense is he'll get excited and attack the Democrats, and attack the process, and, obviously, attack his enemies — of which many happen to be Republicans at this point," Ed Rollins, a longtime Republican strategist who runs the Great America PAC, said in an interview. "The rowdier he gets, the more they'll love it, so that adds fuel to the fire."

Rollins's political action group grew out of Trump's 2016 operation, but it has not committed to supporting him in any future race. With his eye toward unifying the party ahead of the 2022 midterms, Rollins said that Trump would be wise to focus on assuaging the concerns of moderate Republicans. But he added that this probably wasn't the venue for that.

"If he wants to be the leader of this party and continue to be, he has to make peace with Republicans of all varieties," Rollins said. "I think he'll get in front of that crowd, and no matter how carefully scripted they have him going in there, he's going to basically do his own thing — as he has numerous times in the past."

There are some conspicuous absences from the list of CPAC invitees, reflecting the current divide in the party. Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the chamber, who has been open about his desire to leave Trump in the dust, was not invited. Mike Pence, whose term as vice president ended acrimoniously, as he refused to support Trump's 11th-hour power grab, leading Trump's supporters to threaten Pence's life as they stormed the Capitol, declined an invitation to speak. And Nikki Haley, once a rising force in the party, will not be there either — after she gave a withering interview to Politico blasting Trump and saying that he had no future in G.O.P. politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

A poll released Sunday by Suffolk University and USA Today found that three in every five voters who backed Trump last year said they would like to see him run again next time. Just 29 percent said he shouldn't try again.

If there's going to be a splintering of the party's more socially moderate, corporate-minded wing and its increasingly working-class base, the numbers so far favor the base. According to the Suffolk/USA Today survey, voters who backed Trump last year said by a 20-point margin that they felt more loyalty to him than to the Republican Party.

Forty-six percent said they would follow Trump to a new party if he broke away from the G.O.P. And 27 percent said they hadn't made up their minds on it yet.

(The poll's sample included any respondents who had indicated in a Suffolk survey at some point in 2020 that they would vote for Trump, and had said they were willing to be called back after the election. Ninety percent of respondents to this poll indicated that they had, in fact, cast a ballot for him in November.)

ADVERTISEMENT

It's not just Trump the politician who retains his appeal. It's also the groundwork of falsehoods that he laid, and that have become a kind of litmus test for which side of the G.O.P. divide a voter falls on.

Fifty-eight percent of respondents to the Suffolk/USA Today poll said that they thought the Capitol riot on Jan. 6 was primarily the work of antifa, and "only involved a few Trump supporters." Nearly four in five said the rioters would have stormed the Capitol even if Trump hadn't egged them on. By comparison, 28 percent called it "a rally of Trump supporters, some of whom attacked the Capitol," and just 4 percent said it had been an attempted coup.

Trump's claims that the election was stolen from him — which he has repeated in the wake of Limbaugh's death, and which he is likely to air out again on Sunday — still have traction among his supporters. Only 17 percent of respondents to the poll said Biden had been elected president legitimately, despite the absence of real evidence to the contrary.

The House passes sweeping gay and transgender equality legislation

By Catie Edmondson

A divided House today narrowly passed a sprawling bill that would extend civil rights protections to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, but the measure faced an uphill battle to enactment, with Republicans almost uniformly opposed.

The legislation, passed 224 to 206, almost entirely along party lines, stands little chance of drawing enough Republican support in the Senate to advance, at least in its current form. It was the second time the Democratic-led House had passed the measure, known as the Equality Act, which seeks to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to add explicit bans on discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in both public and private spaces.

"In most states, L.G.B.T.Q. people can be discriminated against because of who they are, or who they love," said Representative David Cicilline, an openly gay Democrat from Rhode Island and the lead sponsor. "It is past time for that to change."

In a landmark decision in June, the Supreme Court ruled that the 1964 civil rights law protects gay and transgender people from workplace discrimination, and that the language of the law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, also applies to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Equality Act builds on that ruling, and would expand the scope of civil rights protections beyond workers to consumers at businesses including restaurants, taxi services, gas stations and shelters.

It would also water down the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the 1993 law at the heart of the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case that set a high bar for governments to enact laws that "substantially burden" an individual's freedom to exercise religious beliefs. Those protections have been cited by, for example, bakers or photographers who object to serving same-sex weddings. Those seeking to challenge portions of the Equality Act could not do so under RFRA, according to the legislation.

The House first passed the legislation in 2019, but the Republican-controlled Senate at the time refused to take it up. Upon taking office, President Biden encouraged the Democratic-controlled Congress to "swiftly pass" the bill, calling it a "critical step toward ensuring that America lives up to our foundational values of equality."

But 10 Republicans would need to join Democrats to reach the 60-vote threshold required to pass legislation under normal Senate procedures, a level of support its proponents are unlikely to muster, unless substantial changes are made.

This piece comes from our live briefing, where you can find more updates on the news in Washington today.

DEALBOOK DC POLICY PROJECT

How does the U.S. recover in 2021?

This week, The Times spoke with Treasury Secretary Jane Yellen, Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, New York State Attorney General Letitia James and others about what's needed to kick-start the economy, and the chances of bipartisan deal-making amid deep political divides.

Our colleague Andrew Ross Sorkin, as part of the DealBook DC Policy Project, spoke to Romney and discussed what the senator believes is Trump's future within the party: "I don't know if he'll run in 2024 or not, but if he does I'm pretty sure he will win the nomination."

If you've found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times. Your support makes our work possible.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.
Is there anything you think we're missing? Anything you want to see more of? We'd love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Politics With Lisa Lerer from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home